PREPARING PBT TOEFL PREDICTION: AN EXPERIENCE OF ONLINE TEACHING TOEFL PREPARATION
Abstract
This study is aimed at exploring procedure, and teaching resources prepared by teachers on preparing the PBT TOEFL prediction at STIKES Banisaleh. There are 50 students joining the TOFL preparation course seated in different classes. This study has two research questions; a) How the teaching team use the certain procedure to prepare PBT TOEFL test in online way, b) What varied online teaching resources are applied by team teaching. Descriptive qualitative method is used to analyze the certain procedure and the varied resources used by the teaching team. Questionnaire distributed after the diagnostic test to investigate and prove the student’s preferences of study matched with the teacher’s procedures. Then researcher with the teaching team applied certain procedure. It is preceding Section Two of TOEFL PBT - Structure and Written Expression, then section three – Reading Comprehension, the last Listening Comprehension. And varied online teaching resources also made to accomplish the teaching procedure. It shows that the average score of the PBT TOEFL prediction at STIKES Banisaleh is 400. It means that Preparing PBT TOEFL by preceding Section Two and using varied online teaching resources is effective
References
Akmal, S., Rasyid, M. N. A., Masna, Y., & Soraya, C. N. (2020). Efl Learners’ Difficulties in the Structure and Written Expression Section of Toefl Test in an Indonesian University. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 7(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v7i2.6472
Brown, H. D. (2018). Language assessment : principles and classroom practices / H. DouglasBrown. SERBIULA (sistema Librum 2.0).
Farkhan, M., Nurlia, V., & Haucsa, G. M. (2019). University students ’ perception on TOEFL as a graduation requirement : A case in UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. ELITE Journal: Journal of English Linguistics,Literature, and Education, 1(1), 51–63.
Gray, B., Geluso, J., & Nguyen, P. (2019). The Longitudinal Development of Grammatical Complexity at the Phrasal and Clausal Levels in Spoken and Written Responses to the TOEFL iBT® Test. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12280
Hajri, T., Jufrizal, & Wahyuni, D. (2015). An Analysis of Difficulties in Answering Structure and Written Expression of TOEFL Made By English Students of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 93–105. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/8957/7219
Herwandar, R., Safryono, D. A., & Haryono, P. Y. (2012). Evaluasi Program Matrikulasi ”TOEFL” Mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia 2010/2011. JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA, 1(3), 179. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v1i3.67
Kasim, U. (2016). The implementation of TOEFL of score as a requirement for script examination at Syiah Kuala University. Proceedings of the 1st English Education International Conference (EEIC) in Conjunction with the 2nd Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium (RGRS) of the Consortium of Asia-Pacific Education Universities (CAPEU) between Sultan Idris Education University A, 12, 24–28.
Lawrence, I. (2011). Program History. TOEFL IBT Research, 6, 1–10.
Liu, O. L. (2014). Investigating the Relationship Between Test Preparation and TOEFL iBT ® Performance . ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12016
Manan, A., Fadhilah, M. A., Kamarullah, & Habiburrahim. (2020). Evaluating paper-based toefl preparation program using the context, input, process, and product (Cipp) model. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16467
Netta, A., & Trisnawati, I. K. (2019). Acehnese Undergraduate Students’ Strategies in Preparing for Toefl Prediction: a Preliminary Study. Englisia Journal, 7(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v7i1.5779
Nurhayati, N. (2016). an Analysis of Students’ Strategies in Answering Toefl. Nunung Nurhayati & Berita Mambarasi Nehe The Journal of English Language Studies, 01(01), 10–18.
Philips, D. (2003). Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test. London:Longma
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
Sari, M. (2019). English language teachers ’ self -reported perceptions on toefl preparation program in.
Simanjuntak, A. E. W. (2018). the Effect of Test Preparation Toefl Reading Tests. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v7i1.844
So, Y., Wolf, M. K., Hauck, M. C., Mollaun, P., Rybinski, P., Tumposky, D., & Wang, L. (2017). TOEFL junior® design framework. English Language Proficiency Assessments for Young Learners, June, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674391
Tanihardjo, J. (2017). The Analysis of Students’ English Competence in the Grammar Section in the
Paper-Based TOEFL: A Case Study at English Department in Bunda Mulia University. Journal
of English Language and Culture, 6(1).
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/educational-testing-service-history/
https://www.ets.org/toefl
https://www.ets.org/
Copyright (c) 2021 Sarsono Sarsono, Slamet Basuki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions of Publication
1. As an author you (or your employer r institution) may do the following:
*make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal
*Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreemen" prior to the article publication.
