Face-Saving and Face-Threatening Strategies in Sundanese Teenagers' Interactions through TikTok Content

  • Luki Alifia Mustaam Firmansyah Universitas Pertiwi
  • Sahril Mujani Universitas Pertiwi
  • lilik Pujiani Universitas Pertiwi
Keywords: politeness strategies, undak-usuk, Sundanese teenagers, face-saving, face-threatening

Abstract

In today’s digital landscape, traditional norms of politeness are increasingly challenged by the fluid and often informal nature of online communication, particularly among teenagers. This study focuses on how Sundanese teenagers apply undak-usuk basa, a cultural system of linguistic politeness in their content interactions on TikTok, a platform characterized by spontaneous and casual exchanges. The aim of this research is to analyze how face-saving and face-threatening strategies are utilized by Sundanese-speaking adolescents in digital peer communication. Employing a qualitative approach, the study collects data through observation and discourse analysis of selected TikTok videos. Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory serves as the primary framework to examine how traditional politeness strategies are adapted within modern teenage interactions. The findings reveal that Sundanese teenagers apply undak-usuk basa selectively, influenced by social context, peer dynamics, and platform-specific norms. These results suggest that while digital media shapes communication behavior, the cultural norms embedded in undak-usuk basa remain relevant in the practice of both face-saving and face-threatening acts

References

Anggraeni, S. W., Robandi, B., & Rahman. (2023). The Impact of TikTok Social Media on Children’s Language Politeness . KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 9(2), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.26356
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brooksby, A., Smith, A., Hickam, A., Manda, M., Rogers, A., & LaDuke, M. (2025). A conceptual framework for describing the future impacts of quantum sensors to national security. Academia Quantum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadQuant7590
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, S. (2024). Arbitrariness of Linguistic Signs and Saussure’s Philosophy of Language. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 12(9), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.1209001.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Gulubeyli, S. (2023). Tracing Chomsky's Legacy in Psycholinguistics: A Voyage via the Galilean Investigative Approach. Web of Semantic: Universal Journal on Innovative Education, Volume 2 Issue 11, ISSN: 2835-3048.
Guo, J. (2022). Research on the Influence of TikTok on Teenagers. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 636, pp. 2011–2014). Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220105.254.
Handriani, P. Dinata, A. P., Amelia, F., & Siregar, D. Y. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Cross-Cultural Communication: A Pragmatic Approach. Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya, Vol. 3, Hal 126-132. DOI : https://doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v3i1.1353.
Islami, H. N., Sudana, D., & Gunawan, D. (2024). Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Sundanese Language Podcasts on the YouTube Channel Ridwan Remin. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.10.3.9879.713-729.
Karina, A., Halim, A., & Burhamzah, M. (2023). Teenagers' Impoliteness in the Digital Era and Its Relation to Social Media. ELITERATE: Journal of English, Linguistics, and Literature Studies, Vol. 3, Issue 2, August 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eliterate.v2i3.46378.
Locher, M. A., & Jucker, A. H. (2017). Pragmatics of Digital Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Malekinejad, P. (2022). A Short Note on Linguistics. Research and Reviews: Journal of Social Sciences. DOI: 10.4172/JSocialSciences.8.3.002.
Marino, C., & Gervain, J. (2023). The impact of generative linguistics on psychology: Language acquisition, a paradigm example. Acta Linguistica Academica, Vol. 66 (2019) 3, 371–396. DOI: 10.1556/2062.2019.66.3.4.
Neng, H., & Abidin, Y. (2023). The Impact of Using Tiktok on Student Lifestyles Case Study at Indonesian Education University Bandung Cibiru Campus. The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology, 2(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v2i2.35
Oviogun, P. V., & Veerdee, P. S. (2020). Definition of Language and Linguistics: Basic Competence. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n1.1.
Saussure, F. D. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sehaba, B. (2024). The linguistic lesson in contemporary Western philosophical thought according to De Saussure. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, Vol. 15(2).155-162. ISSN 1989–9572, DOI: 10.47750/jett.2024.15.02.013.
Usman, A, H., Mahmud, A. F., Daud, A., & Dahlan, S. (2020). Language as a Social Instrument. E-Journal Unkhair, Vol. 18 No.2. DOI: 10.33387/Edu.
Zhang, C., Zhao, R., & Huang, Y. (2025). A Bibliometric Analysis of Language Legislation Research From 2005 to 2023. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299614.
(2022). Tiktok: @budaksunda.merch. Diakses pada 2025, 20 Juni dari https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSkLBXdnp/.
(2025). Imminent: Translated’s Research Center. Diakses pada 2025, 6 May dari https://imminent.translated.com/data-index/indonesia.
Published
2025-09-02

Most read articles by the same author(s)