STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS THE ADOPTION OF ODT AND PBL IN SPEAKING CLASS

  • Budiarto Budiarto Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing IEC Jakarta
  • Suhendar Suhendar Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing IEC Jakarta
  • Sri arfani Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Keywords: Speaking, Project-based, ODT, Students’ Perceptions

Abstract

There are many researchers who have been discussing EFL learners’ perceptions on the implementation of online digital technology (ODT), but there are few of them who specifically investigate their familiarity in using technology when applying project-based approach. This research analysis students’ attitudes in using ODT to improve their speaking skills and how familiar students use ODT to accomplish a project in a Speaking Class.  Because the approach of learning English in this research is PBL with ODT, the students must be familiar with the technology in order to create some projects assigned. Therefore, they had to own smartphones or laptops, and familiar with very basic ODT before beginning the program. 24 students of Speaking class were selected and trained to pedagogically show their awareness towards the learning approach and the use of ODT. The researcher divided them into some smaller groups to work together to improve their projects by looking at their learning approach with technology. The result of the posttest indicated their positive attitudes towards the implementation of PBL in the Speaking class with digital technology and the increasing familiarity of using ODT. They realized that they needed to create, and evaluate the results of their project by themselves during online learning to improve their speaking skills.

 

Keywords: Speaking, Project-based, ODT, Students’ Perceptions

References

Ngo, H., & Eichelberger, A. (2019). College students’ attitudes toward ICT use for English learning. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1).
Wrigglesworth, J. (2019). Using smartphones to extend interaction beyond the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958 8221.2019.1569067
Kenning, Marie-Madeleine. (2007). ICT and language learning. ICT and Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 135-170.

Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record,19, pp. 319-335.
Ochoa, T. A., Kelly, M. L., Stuart, S., & Rogers-Adkinson, D. (2004). The impact of PBL technology on the preparation of teachers of English language learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(3), 35-45. https://bit. ly/2HpjKgo
So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of educational technology, 25(1). https://bit.ly/2IXpU7z
Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. eds. (2015). Mobile learning: learning: The next generation. Routledge.
Snelson, C. & Perkins, R. A. (2009). From silent on film to YouTube: Tracing the historical roots of motion picture technology in Education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 28(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2009.11674657 (Watkins & Wikins, 2011).
Deng, L. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Edu- cation, 56(2), 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005
Barrs, K. (2012). Fostering computer-mediated L2 interaction beyond the classroom. Language Learning & Technology,16(1), 10-25. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44269
Alhamami et al. (2019). Effectiveness of flipped language learning classrooms and students’ perspectives, Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 9(1), p-ISSN 2088-1657; e-ISSN2502-6615
Burston, J. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994-2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–225.
Rudolph, J. (2018). A brief review of Mentimeter–A student response system. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 1(1), pp. 35-37. https://bit.ly/2IQapyq
Wagner, E. (2007). Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test. Language Learning and Technology, 11(1), 67-86. http://dx.doi. org/10125/44089
Watkins, J. & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113-120.
Alastuey, M. C. B. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 419-432. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.574639
Çakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 67-73.
Zeng, G. & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the ESL context. System 37(3), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003
Zhang, W. (2010). Blogging for doing English digital: Student evaluations. Computers and Composition, 27(4), 266283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.09.003
Aljumah, F. (2011). Developing Saudi EFL students’ oral skills: An integrative approach. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 84-89.
Cheng Tak Chan. (2021). A Qualitative Study Examining Macao’s Parents’ Attitude towards Native and Non-native English-speaking Teachers for Private Online Synchronous One-on-one English Lessons. Review of Educational Theory, Volume 04, Issue 04, 2021
Published
2022-09-02
How to Cite
Budiarto, B., Suhendar, S., & arfani, S. (2022). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS THE ADOPTION OF ODT AND PBL IN SPEAKING CLASS. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 7(02), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v7i2.158

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>