• Diah Resmisari Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing-IEC Bekasi
  • Herdas Prayunas Rusman Putri Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing IEC Bekasi
  • Abdulloh Abdulloh Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing IEC Bekasi
  • Julyanta Br.Sitepu Br Sitepu Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing IEC Bekasi
Keywords: syntactical errors, , omission, , addition, misformation, misordering, blend, intra- lingual, inter-lingual


This study is motivated by observation data, which shows that the majority of students believe  writing is difficult. To address this issue, the author conducts  research to determine the types of syntactical errors, the dominant type of syntactical errors, and the factors that influence the students' syntactical errors. The descriptive qualitative research method is used in this study. The data are drawn from abstract theses written by undergraduate students at Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing (STIBA)-IEC Bekasi from 2017 to 2019. The research results have been   categorized according to James' (1998) classification of syntactical errors proposed in Error in Language Learning and Use. The analysis reveals the existence of five distinct types of syntactical errors, namely omission, addition, misformation, misordering, and blend. Among these, misformation emerges as the predominant type of syntactical error committed by the students. Furthermore, the occurrence of these syntactical errors is found to be influenced by both inter-lingual and intra-lingual factors.  


Bauer, L. 2007. The Linguistics Student’s Handbook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brown, H. D. (1980). Teaching by Principles: Interactive language teaching methodology. New York: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching By Principles : An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: longman.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of The Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. In Kadarisman,A. Effendi. 2003. Schools of Linguistics: Selected Readings.
Chomsky, N. (2002). “Syntactic Structures”, p.11, Walter de Gruyter
Crystal, D. (1987) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dinamika, G. S et all.(2019).Syntactical Error Analysis on Report Text :.JOALL (Journal of Applied Lingistics and Literature.Vol4, No:2, 2019.
Dulay, Burt, &. Krashen. 1982. Language Two. New York, Oxford University Press.
Hasan, I, et all. 2018. Gramatical Errors Produced by UGM English Department Students: Lexicon, Vol 5 No: 2, October 2018.
Harmer, J. (2007a). How to Teach English. England: Pearson Education Limited Essex.
Harmer, J. (2007b). The Practice of English Language Teaching. England: Pearson Education Limited Essex.
Heaton, John, B. 1990. Writing English Language Test. New York, NY: Longman, Inc
James, Carl. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use. University of California: Longman.
James, Carl. 2013. Errors in Language Learning and Use. P. C. N. CANDLIN. New York: Routledge.
James, C. (2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use. New York: Routledge
Khasanah, Nailatul. 2015. Improving Students’ Writing. FKIP UMP
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
Richards, Jack. C. 1974. Error Analysis: Perspective on second language acquisition. London: Longman
Sinaga, HMR & Sihombing. 2014. Graduate Students’ Syntactical Error in Writing Thesis.
Journal of linguistics of FBS UNIMED
Yusuf, Faidah & Jumriana. 2017. Syntactical Errors Made by Students in Writing Thesis.
Wall, D. (2011). The Impact of Changes in the TOEFL ® Exam on Teaching in a Sample of Countries in Europe : Phase 3, The Role of the Coursebook Phase 4 , Describing Change. (October).
How to Cite
Resmisari, D., Rusman Putri, H., Abdulloh, A., & Sitepu, J. B. (2023). SYNTACTICAL ERROR ANALYSIS OF ABSTRACT THESIS BY UNDER GRADUATE STUDENTS OF SEKOLAH TINGGI BAHASA ASING (STIBA)-IEC BEKASI. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 8(02), 219-228.